Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Tehama County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 141
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $2,910,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Brandt Orchards | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $19,929 |
42 | Paul H Martin Orchards, LLC | Corning, CA 96021 | $19,433 |
43 | Triple Y Ranch Inc | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $18,203 |
44 | The David And Barbara Martin Trus | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $17,787 |
45 | Gregory W Long | Corning, CA 96021 | $17,608 |
46 | Curt Martin Trust Dated June 2 19 | Corning, CA 96021 | $17,459 |
47 | Taylor Konkin | Chico, CA 95973 | $17,351 |
48 | Tejpal S Randhawa | Roseville, CA 95747 | $16,900 |
49 | Red Barn Walnut Company, LLC | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $16,835 |
50 | Rex Wilson | Corning, CA 96021 | $15,524 |
51 | Edward L Redamonti | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $15,461 |
52 | Garry Vance | Corning, CA 96021 | $15,184 |
53 | Michael J Andersen | Vina, CA 96092 | $14,993 |
54 | Gilchrist Properties LLC | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $14,267 |
55 | T A D Farms Inc | Turlock, CA 95382 | $14,060 |
56 | Westover Co | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $13,813 |
57 | Jlc Orchards, Inc | Orland, CA 95963 | $13,495 |
58 | Arlene Rosauer | Corning, CA 96021 | $13,205 |
59 | Kindlespire Farms LLC | Vina, CA 96092 | $12,457 |
60 | Rolling Hills Rr Inc | Corning, CA 96021 | $12,436 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”