Farm Subsidy information
Tehama County, California
Total Subsidies in Tehama County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 214
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $21,235,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Lorrie Sheree Owens | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $47,315 |
62 | Matt Norene | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $46,515 |
63 | Mcarthur Livestock | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $45,147 |
64 | Juan Carlos Nerey | Corning, CA 96021 | $44,729 |
65 | Atkinson Angus Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $44,214 |
66 | Jessica Merkley | Corning, CA 96021 | $43,862 |
67 | Lee C Loverin | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $43,742 |
68 | Sutfin Land & Livestock Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $41,158 |
69 | Susan Knox | Vina, CA 96092 | $40,137 |
70 | Cal-ore Livestock LLC | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $39,856 |
71 | Tyler Martinez | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $39,351 |
72 | Mill Creek Ranch | Canadian, TX 79014 | $38,721 |
73 | Travis R Anderson | Chico, CA 95926 | $36,555 |
74 | Bh Farming Inc | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $35,362 |
75 | James Alford | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $35,053 |
76 | Anchordoguy Kaye LLC | Vina, CA 96092 | $32,813 |
77 | G Ivar Amen | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $31,097 |
78 | One Bar Livestock LLC | Williams, CA 95987 | $30,793 |
79 | Geof Miller | Orland, CA 95963 | $30,758 |
80 | Bert Owens - 2015 Owens Family Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $30,493 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”