Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Tehama County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 355
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $1,404,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Toby L Adams | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,722 |
102 | Monte F Shults | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,722 |
103 | Frank Sanders Jr | Pacheco, CA 94553 | $3,690 |
104 | Twylla Adams | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,641 |
105 | 96 Cattle Co | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,605 |
106 | Wayne Lamson | Corning, CA 96021 | $3,574 |
107 | Millard Hone Jr | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,573 |
108 | Sandra T Flournoy | Flournoy, CA 96029 | $3,371 |
109 | Berens Orchards | Vina, CA 96092 | $3,245 |
110 | Paul Archer | Orland, CA 95963 | $3,231 |
111 | Hook Bar Ranch | Vina, CA 96092 | $3,159 |
112 | Larzabal Ranch | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,152 |
113 | Grant A Amen | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $3,140 |
114 | Sutfin Land & Livestock Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,128 |
115 | William Reeves | Gerber, CA 96035 | $3,123 |
116 | Anthony J Bettencourt | Orland, CA 95963 | $3,105 |
117 | Harry Raplh Heitman | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,074 |
118 | Larry P Lalaguna | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,065 |
119 | Byrd Family Tevocable Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,065 |
120 | Arlo Stroing | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,060 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”