Direct Payment Program in Tehama County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 200
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $7,323,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Merlo-felkins Duck Club | Richvale, CA 95974 | $5,379 |
122 | Michael Felkins | Richvale, CA 95974 | $5,362 |
123 | Jennifer Felkins | Richvale, CA 95974 | $5,360 |
124 | April Merlo | Chico, CA 95926 | $5,358 |
125 | Canea Properties Ltd Partnership | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $5,334 |
126 | Clarence Katen | Tillamook, OR 97141 | $4,850 |
127 | C D Mcconville | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $4,795 |
128 | Sobek LLC | Fremont, CA 94539 | $4,766 |
129 | Philip E Mackey | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $4,748 |
130 | Sharon L Rodriguez | Paskenta, CA 96074 | $4,699 |
131 | John C Ohm | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $4,671 |
132 | Angelo Louis Andreini III | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $4,619 |
133 | Bert Owens - 2015 Owens Family Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $4,551 |
134 | Carolyn Matz Trust Dated May 17 2 | Corning, CA 96021 | $4,520 |
135 | William A Reeves & Virginia L Ree | Gerber, CA 96035 | $4,272 |
136 | Jack Lawson | Gerber, CA 96035 | $4,073 |
137 | Cypress Abbey Company | Colma, CA 94014 | $4,072 |
138 | Connie E Heyrend | Paskenta, CA 96074 | $4,020 |
139 | Red Bank Farms | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,679 |
140 | Fred Cornacchioli Jr | Carmichael, CA 95608 | $3,460 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”