Total Commodity Programs in Tehama County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 823
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $54,876,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ag Vantage | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $120,740 |
122 | Gregory W Long | Corning, CA 96021 | $119,303 |
123 | A P Esteve Farms Ltd | Lodi, CA 95242 | $112,315 |
124 | Slaven Family Revocable Trust | Zamora, CA 95698 | $112,215 |
125 | Elmer Fobian | Willows, CA 95988 | $108,293 |
126 | Dane Nissen | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $107,092 |
127 | Schermer Ranch | Glenn, CA 95943 | $106,824 |
128 | Curt Martin Trust Dated June 2 19 | Corning, CA 96021 | $105,340 |
129 | Clarence Katen | Tillamook, OR 97141 | $104,483 |
130 | Gilchrist Properties LLC | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $103,647 |
131 | The David And Barbara Martin Trus | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $103,219 |
132 | Kent M Kohler | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $101,582 |
133 | Ray Wilson | Gerber, CA 96035 | $99,717 |
134 | Barnes Cattle Company Inc | Julian, CA 92036 | $98,930 |
135 | Moser & Moser | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $97,275 |
136 | Grant Leininger | Vina, CA 96092 | $96,680 |
137 | Lassen Farms | Gerber, CA 96035 | $95,456 |
138 | Richard P O'sullivan | Paynes Creek, CA 96075 | $95,273 |
139 | Westover Co | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $95,104 |
140 | Mark T Michaelis | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $94,700 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”