Market Loss Assistance Program in Tehama County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 192
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $4,297,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Mckenna Farms | Orland, CA 95963 | $1,466 |
142 | Jean Silver Estate | Santa Maria, CA 93455 | $1,265 |
143 | Sutfin Land & Livestock Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $1,256 |
144 | Raymond L Verdun | Corning, CA 96021 | $1,227 |
145 | Katherine M Burt | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $1,186 |
146 | Sharon L Rodriguez | Paskenta, CA 96074 | $1,186 |
147 | Mary L Burt Estate | Flournoy, CA 96029 | $1,186 |
148 | Larry D Burt | Flournoy, CA 96029 | $1,186 |
149 | Connie E Heyrend | Paskenta, CA 96074 | $1,186 |
150 | C Leroy Myers | Modesto, CA 95350 | $1,108 |
151 | John Bedford | Flournoy, CA 96029 | $1,006 |
152 | Joseph Golonka | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $972 |
153 | Fay Sutfin | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $964 |
154 | George M Stutz | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $950 |
155 | Larry J Lalaguna Sr | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $918 |
156 | Alford Ranch Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $863 |
157 | Siemens Family Revocable Trust Of | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $852 |
158 | Sue Holubowsky | Corning, CA 96021 | $839 |
159 | Wayne E Martin | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $825 |
160 | Gregory P Slade | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $775 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”