Total Commodity Programs in Tehama County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 215
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $3,051,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Fee Agricultural Inc | Orland, CA 95963 | $2,188 |
142 | Raymond L Verdun | Corning, CA 96021 | $2,160 |
143 | Humphrey Ranch Inc | Flournoy, CA 96029 | $2,123 |
144 | John T Smith | Gerber, CA 96035 | $2,123 |
145 | Hazel Brown | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $2,122 |
146 | Berens Orchards | Vina, CA 96092 | $2,096 |
147 | David Wohletz | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $2,061 |
148 | Hazel Brandt | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $1,979 |
149 | Wayne Conner | Corning, CA 96021 | $1,974 |
150 | Henry Heitman | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $1,951 |
151 | Tom Stroing | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $1,925 |
152 | Warren H Rickert Decedents Tr Dated 3-3-2009 | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $1,921 |
153 | Jessica Merkley | Corning, CA 96021 | $1,893 |
154 | Richard Thomas Fimea | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $1,888 |
155 | Westley M Schager | Orland, CA 95963 | $1,863 |
156 | William E Foster | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $1,843 |
157 | Matthew Biaggi | Paskenta, CA 96074 | $1,843 |
158 | Nina Langford | Paskenta, CA 96074 | $1,834 |
159 | Garry Vance | Corning, CA 96021 | $1,790 |
160 | Larry B & Linda D Galper Revocable Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $1,753 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”