Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Tehama County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 86
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $1,506,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Koehn Organics LLC | Corning, CA 96021 | $16,192 |
22 | Sutfin Land & Livestock Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $13,687 |
23 | Nick P Sohrakoff Jr | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $13,239 |
24 | Benjamin Mikal Williams | Corning, CA 96021 | $12,883 |
25 | Jose Mendoza | Corning, CA 96021 | $11,614 |
26 | Trent Thomas | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $11,594 |
27 | Nirmal S Janda | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $11,070 |
28 | Mark T Michaelis | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $10,928 |
29 | Marvin Lawrence | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $10,792 |
30 | Bryan Griffin | Sierraville, CA 96126 | $10,175 |
31 | Ryan Sale | Redmond, OR 97756 | $10,168 |
32 | Dutro Farms Inc | Chico, CA 95973 | $10,038 |
33 | Johnny Vogt Sr | Orland, CA 95963 | $9,909 |
34 | Alberico Living Trust 10/10/79 | Orland, CA 95963 | $9,678 |
35 | Thomas E Frankovich | Orland, CA 95963 | $8,910 |
36 | Louise A Gwaltney | Gerber, CA 96035 | $7,944 |
37 | Grant A Amen | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $6,710 |
38 | Golden Valley Farms Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $6,571 |
39 | James Brandt | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $6,446 |
40 | Steve L Bohme | Corning, CA 96021 | $6,405 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”