Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Tehama County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 388
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $12,989,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Roger Nicholson | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $397,519 |
2 | Richard P O'sullivan | Paynes Creek, CA 96075 | $386,767 |
3 | John B Owens | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $386,029 |
4 | Darrell Wood | Vina, CA 96092 | $375,560 |
5 | Elpidio Tapia | Corning, CA 96021 | $364,651 |
6 | Kenneth & Sheree Owens Family 1996 Revocable Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $324,942 |
7 | Bidwell Ranches Inc | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $295,746 |
8 | Juan Nerey | Corning, CA 96021 | $282,185 |
9 | Felipe Ternero | Granite Bay, CA 95746 | $268,646 |
10 | Rosalio Lopez Curiel | Corning, CA 96021 | $265,153 |
11 | Lazy Spade LLC | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $247,631 |
12 | Kramer Ranch LLC | Bieber, CA 96009 | $246,671 |
13 | Richard Rowland | Chico, CA 95973 | $228,322 |
14 | Sugargrass LLC | Dairy, OR 97625 | $221,119 |
15 | Tom Burrill | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $210,177 |
16 | La Conda Ranch Inc | Corning, CA 96021 | $206,167 |
17 | Dusty Debraga | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $204,503 |
18 | Rick Arrowsmith | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $176,254 |
19 | Jose Curiel Sr | Corning, CA 96021 | $174,146 |
20 | Pablo Nerey | Corning, CA 96021 | $166,338 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>