Farm Subsidy information
Tehama County, California
Total Subsidies in Tehama County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,536
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $145,439,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Zuppan Dairy | Orland, CA 95963 | $492,548 |
42 | Pacific Farms & Orchards Inc | Gerber, CA 96035 | $487,203 |
43 | Johnny Vogt Sr | Orland, CA 95963 | $479,088 |
44 | Johnson & Neles Dairy | Sonoma, CA 95476 | $476,526 |
45 | Marenco Cattle Company Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $474,544 |
46 | Andersen & Sons Ranch Inc | Vina, CA 96092 | $465,665 |
47 | Williams Ranch | Corning, CA 96021 | $463,218 |
48 | Charles R Crain Jr | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $462,553 |
49 | Jensen Ranch | Orland, CA 95963 | $460,805 |
50 | J T Farms | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $455,018 |
51 | Haleakala Ranch LLC | Gerber, CA 96035 | $452,950 |
52 | Rick Arrowsmith | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $448,962 |
53 | Kramer Ranch LLC | Bieber, CA 96009 | $448,201 |
54 | Bert Owens - 2015 Owens Family Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $432,267 |
55 | Ramiro Ferreira | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $420,630 |
56 | Abbey Ranch Inc | Vina, CA 96092 | $412,570 |
57 | Lindauer River Ranch Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $412,215 |
58 | Cypress Abbey Company | Colma, CA 94014 | $403,307 |
59 | Lpdb LLC | Woodland, CA 95695 | $401,761 |
60 | Shasta Livestock Auction Yard Inc | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $401,690 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”