Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Tehama County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 33
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $504,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kramer Ranch LLC | Bieber, CA 96009 | $196,695 |
2 | Doyle Ranch Inc | Corning, CA 96021 | $73,304 |
3 | Jensen Ranch | Orland, CA 95963 | $58,370 |
4 | Zuppan Dairy | Orland, CA 95963 | $39,463 |
5 | Hubbard Family Trust | Corning, CA 96021 | $38,057 |
6 | Roger Nicholson | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $15,315 |
7 | Turri Family Farms | Flournoy, CA 96029 | $10,459 |
8 | Anna Marie Stephens | Concord, CA 94519 | $9,633 |
9 | Sugargrass LLC | Dairy, OR 97625 | $9,616 |
10 | Zuppan Dairy Partnership | Orland, CA 95963 | $9,267 |
11 | Johnson & Neles Dairy | Sonoma, CA 95476 | $7,619 |
12 | Cotton Bow Ranch | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $4,602 |
13 | Carolyn Matz Trust Dated May 17 2 | Corning, CA 96021 | $3,804 |
14 | Johnny Vogt Sr | Orland, CA 95963 | $3,597 |
15 | James Milton Jobe Separate Proper | Corning, CA 96021 | $3,420 |
16 | Sutfin Land & Livestock Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $2,677 |
17 | Sharon L Rodriguez | Paskenta, CA 96074 | $2,642 |
18 | Bert Owens - 2015 Owens Family Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $2,568 |
19 | Peter L Kampmann | Orland, CA 95963 | $2,118 |
20 | 2015 Owens Family Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $2,008 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>