Loan Deficiency in Tehama County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 72
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $655,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Moser & Moser | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $7,915 |
22 | Ramiro Ferreira | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $7,733 |
23 | Tehama Angus Ranch Inc | Gerber, CA 96035 | $7,537 |
24 | Kevin Cheda | Petaluma, CA 94975 | $6,547 |
25 | Williams Ranch | Corning, CA 96021 | $5,856 |
26 | Jorge Pimentel | Corning, CA 96021 | $5,103 |
27 | Mr James A Weber | Orland, CA 95963 | $4,762 |
28 | Johnson & Neles Dairy | Sonoma, CA 95476 | $4,409 |
29 | Raymond E White | Corning, CA 96021 | $4,291 |
30 | James & Pamela Wilson Revocable Trust | Orland, CA 95963 | $4,017 |
31 | Lance R Bundy | Vina, CA 96092 | $3,333 |
32 | Antonio Amorim | Turlock, CA 95380 | $3,147 |
33 | Jim M Bianchi | Durham, CA 95938 | $2,503 |
34 | Bill Foley & Mike Foley | Corning, CA 96021 | $2,411 |
35 | Rumiano Farms | Vina, CA 96092 | $1,923 |
36 | Joseph Golonka | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $1,902 |
37 | Clarence Katen | Tillamook, OR 97141 | $1,892 |
38 | Edward Weston | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $1,340 |
39 | Steve L Bohme | Corning, CA 96021 | $1,326 |
40 | Trevor D Adams | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $1,221 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”