Total Commodity Programs in Tehama County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 59
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $672,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Zuppan Dairy Partnership | Orland, CA 95963 | $132,332 |
2 | Johnny Vogt Sr | Orland, CA 95963 | $128,130 |
3 | Robert D Fumasi Family Trust-robert Fumasi | Orland, CA 95963 | $79,714 |
4 | Pablo Nerey | Corning, CA 96021 | $36,417 |
5 | Duck Pond Orchards LLC | West Sacramento, CA 95691 | $30,359 |
6 | Eduardo Curiel | Corning, CA 96021 | $21,186 |
7 | Edward L Redamonti | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $20,818 |
8 | Juan Nerey | Corning, CA 96021 | $14,416 |
9 | Kent M Kohler | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $11,875 |
10 | Andersen & Sons Ranch Inc | Vina, CA 96092 | $11,875 |
11 | Doyle Ranch Inc | Corning, CA 96021 | $11,875 |
12 | Jose Curiel Sr | Corning, CA 96021 | $11,875 |
13 | Amp Farms Inc | Vina, CA 96092 | $11,875 |
14 | Mag Farms, Inc - Dfhb | Corning, CA 96021 | $11,875 |
15 | The David And Barbara Martin Trus | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $11,875 |
16 | Colby Seth Camacho | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $11,175 |
17 | Rosalio Lopez Curiel | Corning, CA 96021 | $8,505 |
18 | T A D Farms Inc | Turlock, CA 95382 | $7,574 |
19 | Russell Harman | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $6,936 |
20 | Daniel A Sutfin | Corning, CA 96021 | $6,267 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>