Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in Tulare County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,193
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in Tulare County, California totaled $5,955,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Griffith Farms | Exeter, CA 93221 | $28,088 |
42 | R-7 Enterprises | Visalia, CA 93292 | $26,904 |
43 | Michael L Smith | Porterville, CA 93257 | $25,995 |
44 | R G Burns | Porterville, CA 93257 | $25,844 |
45 | Owen Family Living Trust | Porterville, CA 93257 | $25,736 |
46 | Richard Callison | Porterville, CA 93257 | $25,686 |
47 | Hazel Joyce Young Trust | Dayton, OH 45419 | $25,546 |
48 | Jack Da Costa | Tulare, CA 93274 | $25,128 |
49 | Mt View Farming Inc | Tulare, CA 93274 | $25,112 |
50 | Surinder Singh Toor | Visalia, CA 93277 | $24,999 |
51 | Kaweah Lemon Co | Lemon Cove, CA 93244 | $24,480 |
52 | Carol Bates | Porterville, CA 93257 | $24,282 |
53 | Deer Creek Heights Ranch | Porterville, CA 93257 | $23,874 |
54 | Bob Lewis | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $23,041 |
55 | Meling Brothers II | Visalia, CA 93292 | $22,104 |
56 | Mario Simoes Jr | Tulare, CA 93274 | $21,691 |
57 | Celeste Simoes | Tipton, CA 93272 | $21,691 |
58 | Cosart Brothers | Exeter, CA 93221 | $20,514 |
59 | John E Simoes Sr | Tulare, CA 93274 | $19,813 |
60 | Edie Simoes | Tulare, CA 93274 | $19,813 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”