Dairy Programs in Tulare County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 209
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Tulare County, California totaled $24,599,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Tony Cox And Family Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $127,173 |
42 | Western Pacific Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $127,173 |
43 | M Bar 9 Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $127,173 |
44 | Fern Oaks Farms | Porterville, CA 93257 | $127,173 |
45 | Riverbend South | Tulare, CA 93274 | $127,173 |
46 | Vida Boa Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $127,173 |
47 | Vander Tuig Dairy | Strathmore, CA 93267 | $127,173 |
48 | William & John Jongsma Dairy | Pixley, CA 93256 | $127,173 |
49 | Borges Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $127,173 |
50 | Ron Verhoeven Family Dairy | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $127,173 |
51 | Riverbend Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $127,173 |
52 | Will De Groot Dairy | Pixley, CA 93256 | $127,173 |
53 | Pacific Sun Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $127,173 |
54 | T Bar Dairy | Porterville, CA 93257 | $127,173 |
55 | Moon Light Dairy | Visalia, CA 93277 | $127,173 |
56 | John Jongsma Dairy | Pixley, CA 93256 | $127,173 |
57 | Jesse & James Jongsma Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $127,173 |
58 | Joseph Bakker Dba Backroad Ranch | Tulare, CA 93274 | $127,173 |
59 | Joshua & James Jongsma Dairy | Pixley, CA 93256 | $127,173 |
60 | Jongsma Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $127,173 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”