Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Tulare County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 86
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Tulare County, California totaled $1,055,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Cantrelle Ranch LLC | Raymond, CA 93653 | $7,668 |
42 | Marina Monica Dunn | Porterville, CA 93257 | $7,596 |
43 | Susan L Mello | Orosi, CA 93647 | $7,137 |
44 | Nathan Michael Mello | Orosi, CA 93647 | $7,137 |
45 | William Clayton Havard | Woodlake, CA 93286 | $6,923 |
46 | Johnson Moore Cattle Co LLC | Orange Cove, CA 93646 | $6,585 |
47 | Lee Ann Ketscher | Squaw Valley, CA 93675 | $6,174 |
48 | John C Vincent Jr | Three Rivers, CA 93271 | $6,161 |
49 | Ron Frazier | Visalia, CA 93291 | $6,060 |
50 | John Schultz Jr | Exeter, CA 93221 | $5,606 |
51 | Lana Trotter | Porterville, CA 93257 | $5,544 |
52 | Jay Zike | Lindsay, CA 93247 | $5,171 |
53 | Wayne E Weller | Exeter, CA 93221 | $4,965 |
54 | Mindy Hooper | Porterville, CA 93257 | $3,789 |
55 | Gratian J Bidart | Porterville, CA 93257 | $3,191 |
56 | Dusty Boesch | Porterville, CA 93257 | $3,184 |
57 | Matt Hooper | Porterville, CA 93257 | $3,158 |
58 | Taylor J Selby | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $3,017 |
59 | Ferreira Land Co Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $2,850 |
60 | Jacob Bender | Lemon Cove, CA 93244 | $2,816 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”