Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Tulare County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 204
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Tulare County, California totaled $2,068,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Badger Hill Association | Exeter, CA 93221 | $15,369 |
42 | Sierra Quail Farms Inc | Tulare, CA 93275 | $14,660 |
43 | Manuel Leal & Son | Tulare, CA 93274 | $14,515 |
44 | Rabb Bros Ranch Inc | San Joaquin, CA 93660 | $14,515 |
45 | Sequoia Riverlands Trust | Visalia, CA 93277 | $14,511 |
46 | Robert L Nichols | San Pedro, CA 90732 | $14,384 |
47 | Hyde Ranch | Visalia, CA 93279 | $14,250 |
48 | Mark Tiersma | Visalia, CA 93291 | $14,084 |
49 | Frank Rodrigues | Tulare, CA 93275 | $13,980 |
50 | R Castro Jr Farms | Tulare, CA 93274 | $13,973 |
51 | Carl Mendonca | Tulare, CA 93274 | $13,950 |
52 | Wilbur Hettinga | Tulare, CA 93274 | $13,800 |
53 | Henry A Garcia Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $13,725 |
54 | Monrovia Nursery Co | Woodlake, CA 93286 | $13,688 |
55 | Takashi Inouye | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $13,368 |
56 | Alyn Pedroncelli | Tulare, CA 93274 | $13,360 |
57 | Cojo Ranch Limited Partnership | Porterville, CA 93257 | $13,005 |
58 | Linda Prentiss | Springville, CA 93265 | $12,655 |
59 | Joel & Judith Isaak Living Trust | Dinuba, CA 93618 | $12,547 |
60 | Stanley Vanden Brink Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $12,332 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”