Total Commodity Programs in Tulare County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,531
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Tulare County, California totaled $109,339,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | De Groot Dairies | Tulare, CA 93274 | $283,770 |
82 | Golden State Dairy | Pixley, CA 93256 | $278,403 |
83 | Bakker Dairy | Visalia, CA 93291 | $277,011 |
84 | Nunes & Sons Inc | Tulare, CA 93274 | $276,506 |
85 | Legacy Ranches | Tipton, CA 93272 | $275,767 |
86 | Joe M Simoes Family Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $269,228 |
87 | Progressive Properties & Investments LLC | Tulare, CA 93274 | $266,466 |
88 | Jacobus De Groot Dairy 1 & 2 | Visalia, CA 93291 | $264,158 |
89 | County Line Ranch | Exeter, CA 93221 | $261,715 |
90 | Mbennett LLC | Ducor, CA 93218 | $257,643 |
91 | Dennis Boertje & Son Dairy | Visalia, CA 93292 | $254,950 |
92 | P&r Brar Farms LLC | Visalia, CA 93290 | $254,614 |
93 | Borba Dairy | Porterville, CA 93257 | $254,346 |
94 | Riddle Farms LLC | Orosi, CA 93647 | $253,943 |
95 | Art Leyendekker Dairy | Visalia, CA 93291 | $253,008 |
96 | Elk Creek Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $252,590 |
97 | Fred E Leavitt | Exeter, CA 93221 | $250,000 |
98 | Central Valley Farms Lp | Porterville, CA 93257 | $250,000 |
99 | W H Latimer Properties LLC | San Clemente, CA 92673 | $250,000 |
100 | Anreet Toor | Visalia, CA 93277 | $250,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”