Cotton Ginning Program in Tulare County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 126
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Tulare County, California totaled $1,409,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Nancy A Edelberg Family Trust Dtd 11/15/2011 | Windsor, CO 80550 | $435 |
102 | John Domingos | Tulare, CA 93274 | $428 |
103 | John Domingos Uwo Margaret Trust | Tulare, CA 93274 | $428 |
104 | Patricia Roberts | Tipton, CA 93272 | $390 |
105 | Judy Mccaslan | Tipton, CA 93272 | $390 |
106 | Kenneth Leroy Glover | Strathmore, CA 93267 | $381 |
107 | Patricia Ann Clubb | Tulare, CA 93274 | $356 |
108 | Theresa Louise Massey-rocha | Tulare, CA 93274 | $356 |
109 | Gary Glennell Pratt Estate Of 9-1 | Visalia, CA 93292 | $313 |
110 | Lionel & Julia Moreno 2002 Revoca | Visalia, CA 93277 | $300 |
111 | Elden James Shepherd | Tulare, CA 93274 | $271 |
112 | Paul Richard Shepherd | Sallisaw, OK 74955 | $271 |
113 | Ron Rink | Visalia, CA 93277 | $236 |
114 | Colette Rink | Tulare, CA 93274 | $236 |
115 | Marilyn T Doe Rev Trust 10-4-00 | Visalia, CA 93291 | $236 |
116 | Timothy J & Barbara C Cooper Revo | Tulare, CA 93274 | $221 |
117 | Wonder Family Trust Dated May 14 2004 | Pismo Beach, CA 93449 | $218 |
118 | John W Wonder | Moraga, CA 94556 | $217 |
119 | Alissa M Shepherd | Tulare, CA 93274 | $179 |
120 | Michael V Shepherd | Tulare, CA 93274 | $178 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”