Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Tulare County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,836
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Tulare County, California totaled $90,197,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Edward B & Elizabeth F Cornell Tr | Porterville, CA 93258 | $132,865 |
122 | William E & Ernesteen J Ferry 199 | Woodlake, CA 93286 | $131,975 |
123 | Robert Shannon Ritchie | Bakersfield, CA 93308 | $130,777 |
124 | Miguel Gutierrez | Lindsay, CA 93247 | $130,482 |
125 | Agco Farms | Ducor, CA 93218 | $129,974 |
126 | Dhillon Farms | Delano, CA 93215 | $129,082 |
127 | Yokohl Valley Land Co | Exeter, CA 93221 | $128,782 |
128 | James A Atwell | Alpaugh, CA 93201 | $127,893 |
129 | Katayama & Sons Inc | Orosi, CA 93647 | $127,117 |
130 | Sundale Vineyards | Tulare, CA 93274 | $126,372 |
131 | Royal Farms Inc | Tulare, CA 93274 | $125,962 |
132 | Kransig Corporation | Strathmore, CA 93267 | $125,948 |
133 | Tri Mont Farms | Visalia, CA 93291 | $125,879 |
134 | La Buena Vida Partners | Burlingame, CA 94010 | $125,353 |
135 | Gobel Bros | Porterville, CA 93257 | $123,642 |
136 | Harvinder S Toor | Pixley, CA 93256 | $123,600 |
137 | Glen Webb | San Jose, CA 95125 | $123,340 |
138 | Paul Rosen | San Jose, CA 95125 | $123,340 |
139 | Edward Schwartz | San Jose, CA 95125 | $123,340 |
140 | Granja Guzman Ranches | Porterville, CA 93258 | $123,231 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”