Dairy Programs in Tulare County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 201
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Tulare County, California totaled $2,277,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Jesse & James Jongsma Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $10,452 |
122 | Joseph Bakker Dba Backroad Ranch | Tulare, CA 93274 | $10,452 |
123 | Brandon Vander Poel Dba Cutler Dairy | Visalia, CA 93290 | $10,452 |
124 | Cristiano Martins Dba Mil Flow Dairy Cow Palace | Hanford, CA 93230 | $10,452 |
125 | Double Oak Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $10,452 |
126 | Joshua & James Jongsma Dairy | Pixley, CA 93256 | $10,452 |
127 | Roger Fluegel | Visalia, CA 93290 | $10,452 |
128 | Channel Islands Dairy Farms LLC | Long Beach, CA 90815 | $10,452 |
129 | K A Vanderham Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $10,452 |
130 | Brian James Jongsma Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $10,452 |
131 | Diamond L Milk Company | Tulare, CA 93274 | $10,452 |
132 | , | $10,452 | |
133 | Frank D Mendonsa | Tulare, CA 93274 | $10,452 |
134 | Shirk Dairy | Visalia, CA 93292 | $10,452 |
135 | Gerben Leyendekker | Visalia, CA 93291 | $10,452 |
136 | Pauline V Leyendekker | Visalia, CA 93291 | $10,452 |
137 | Marchelle Mendonsa | Tulare, CA 93274 | $10,452 |
138 | Fl Dairy | Visalia, CA 93291 | $10,452 |
139 | Nancy Leyendekker | Visalia, CA 93291 | $10,452 |
140 | Brenda De Jong | Visalia, CA 93292 | $10,452 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”