Farm Subsidy information
Tulare County, California
Total Subsidies in Tulare County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 7,802
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tulare County, California totaled $1,703,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | V S T Farms | Pismo Beach, CA 93449 | $1,708,346 |
122 | Marchelle Mendonsa | Tulare, CA 93274 | $1,686,690 |
123 | Pires Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $1,682,542 |
124 | Pratt Ranches | Visalia, CA 93292 | $1,669,969 |
125 | 4k Dairy Family Partnership | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $1,633,654 |
126 | Bar Vp Dairy | Pixley, CA 93256 | $1,621,438 |
127 | Kisling Farms | Terra Bella, CA 93270 | $1,615,422 |
128 | J & J Vander Poel Dairy | Pixley, CA 93256 | $1,605,736 |
129 | Rancho Teresita Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $1,605,552 |
130 | De Groot Dairy Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,588,126 |
131 | Louie De Groot Dairy | Pixley, CA 93256 | $1,583,997 |
132 | Bel R Martin & Sons Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $1,576,881 |
133 | Tri Palm Dairy | Visalia, CA 93277 | $1,576,164 |
134 | Horizon Jerseys | Tipton, CA 93272 | $1,565,466 |
135 | David H & Gail Y Jackson | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $1,563,906 |
136 | Craig Silveira | Tulare, CA 93274 | $1,558,123 |
137 | Scheenstra Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $1,555,633 |
138 | Decade Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $1,553,643 |
139 | Friesian Farms Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $1,551,783 |
140 | Bos Farms Lp | Tulare, CA 93274 | $1,544,053 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”