Dairy Programs in Tulare County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 676
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Tulare County, California totaled $148,071,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Double Oak Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $291,979 |
182 | M & D Dairy And Cattle Company | Visalia, CA 93291 | $290,193 |
183 | K A Vanderham Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $289,532 |
184 | Little H Dairy | Pixley, CA 93256 | $289,184 |
185 | Hynes Dairy LLC | Tulare, CA 93274 | $288,821 |
186 | Bar Vp Dairy | Pixley, CA 93256 | $287,405 |
187 | Heritage Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $287,136 |
188 | Outlaw Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $285,657 |
189 | Theodore Anthony Joseph Pedrozo | Visalia, CA 93277 | $285,114 |
190 | Ed Souza And Son | Tulare, CA 93274 | $284,758 |
191 | John Lopes Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $282,951 |
192 | M J Brothers | Tulare, CA 93275 | $281,123 |
193 | Frank Pinheiro Dairy | Strathmore, CA 93267 | $280,220 |
194 | Joe Pinheiro & Sons Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $280,199 |
195 | Ponderosa Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $279,653 |
196 | Rancho Teresita Dairy 2 | Tulare, CA 93274 | $279,064 |
197 | East Ridge Farms LLC | Tipton, CA 93272 | $277,806 |
198 | Mellema Dairy | Visalia, CA 93291 | $276,732 |
199 | Simoes Sandlin Family Farms LLC | Tulare, CA 93274 | $276,594 |
200 | John Mendonca & Son Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $275,664 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”