Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Ventura County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 61
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Ventura County, California totaled $836,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Robert B Frost | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $90,453 |
2 | Coastal Cattle Company LLC | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $63,353 |
3 | Martin Morehart | Santa Paula, CA 93061 | $59,608 |
4 | Richard A Atmore | Ventura, CA 93003 | $49,503 |
5 | John S Harvey H Cattle Company | Oxnard, CA 93036 | $43,061 |
6 | William Hinderer | Westlake Village, CA 91361 | $41,377 |
7 | Cole Family Partnership Ltd | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $36,267 |
8 | H Cattle Co | Oxnard, CA 93036 | $36,072 |
9 | R A Atmore & Sons Inc | Ventura, CA 93003 | $34,190 |
10 | Kenneth B Rogers | Fillmore, CA 93015 | $31,997 |
11 | Aubrey Sloan Jr | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $29,753 |
12 | Julie Lovelace | Piru, CA 93040 | $29,438 |
13 | Charles Perkins | Santa Barbara, CA 93108 | $27,743 |
14 | Donna Johanson | Santa Rosa Valley, CA 93012 | $21,119 |
15 | Pierre Esponde | Camarillo, CA 93011 | $18,632 |
16 | Beverly Bigger | Ventura, CA 93004 | $17,068 |
17 | Elizabeth M Bishop | Piru, CA 93040 | $16,051 |
18 | Rancho Temescal LLC | Piru, CA 93040 | $14,217 |
19 | Jeffrey Fontes | Fillmore, CA 93015 | $13,759 |
20 | Daniel R Miller | Piru, CA 93040 | $12,519 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>