Emergency Conservation Program in Ventura County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 326
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Ventura County, California totaled $8,528,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mixtekz Berries Inc | Port Hueneme, CA 93044 | $54,926 |
42 | Brucker Farms Inc | Camarillo, CA 93012 | $53,768 |
43 | Steve Dyer | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $51,253 |
44 | Roland Messori | Santa Barbara, CA 93108 | $51,012 |
45 | Flying D Ranch LLC | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $50,760 |
46 | Belmonte West Ranch | Ojai, CA 93023 | $49,248 |
47 | , | $48,355 | |
48 | Mike Plater | Somis, CA 93066 | $48,000 |
49 | Mittag Farms | Somis, CA 93066 | $46,906 |
50 | Taylorchards LLC | Ventura, CA 93001 | $45,620 |
51 | Anacapa Properties LLC | Ventura, CA 93006 | $45,206 |
52 | Everett H Williams | Fillmore, CA 93015 | $44,775 |
53 | Van Der Kar Family Properties Lp | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $44,444 |
54 | Stanley Park Ranch Inc | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $43,903 |
55 | Winkler Family Limited Partnershi | Fillmore, CA 93015 | $43,898 |
56 | El Rancho Marma II & III | Fillmore, CA 93015 | $42,240 |
57 | Martin Morehart | Santa Paula, CA 93061 | $40,838 |
58 | San Miguel Produce Inc | Oxnard, CA 93033 | $40,026 |
59 | Kaoae Farms LLC | Ventura, CA 93001 | $39,501 |
60 | Dennis Noble | Oxnard, CA 93030 | $39,155 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”