Farm Subsidy information
Ventura County, California
Total Subsidies in Ventura County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 150
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ventura County, California totaled $11,764,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | , | $43,640 | |
42 | , | $43,014 | |
43 | R W Pidduck Trust Dated 6/1/2015 | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $42,177 |
44 | Deborah A Burns | Santa Paula, CA 93061 | $41,645 |
45 | Victor C Hostetter | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $38,386 |
46 | Mark Bruce | Simi Valley, CA 93065 | $37,403 |
47 | Lemoravo Limited Partnership | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $36,947 |
48 | Del Cielo LLC | Ventura, CA 93001 | $35,171 |
49 | Glen & Kimberly Carmichael Jt Living Trust | Somis, CA 93066 | $34,689 |
50 | Little Bison Farm LLC | Somis, CA 93066 | $33,826 |
51 | Friend's Ranches Inc | Ojai, CA 93023 | $30,745 |
52 | Oso Del Norte Ranch LLC | Anchorage, AK 99515 | $29,012 |
53 | Gilbert S K Kim | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $28,220 |
54 | Daniel R Miller | Piru, CA 93040 | $28,131 |
55 | Essick Essick Family Trust | Ojai, CA 93023 | $26,366 |
56 | , | $26,271 | |
57 | Gfo LLC | Moorpark, CA 93021 | $26,163 |
58 | R A Atmore & Sons Inc Dba Foothill Weed Abatement | Ventura, CA 93003 | $26,035 |
59 | Michael Fiano | Ventura, CA 93001 | $25,504 |
60 | Friends Stable And Orchard Inc. | Ojai, CA 93023 | $25,107 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”