Total Commodity Programs in Ventura County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 181
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Ventura County, California totaled $8,385,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | William A Miller | Moorpark, CA 93021 | $34,800 |
62 | M Golden Management Services Inc | Port Hueneme, CA 93041 | $34,596 |
63 | Foothill Road Ranch LLC | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $33,898 |
64 | Balcom Ranch | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $32,684 |
65 | Sycamore Heights Partnership | Camarillo, CA 93010 | $32,655 |
66 | Mrs Marjie Ann Bartels | Fillmore, CA 93015 | $32,025 |
67 | La Pedrera LLC | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $32,017 |
68 | Michael D Kelley | Somis, CA 93066 | $31,390 |
69 | Rancho Cream Inc | Somis, CA 93066 | $29,911 |
70 | William Gayron Downs | Somis, CA 93066 | $27,253 |
71 | Anthony Edwin Brown Dba Rincon Del Mar Ranch | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $27,116 |
72 | Fv Royal Dawn LLC | Santa Barbara, CA 93105 | $25,799 |
73 | High Lemons Lp | Soledad, CA 93960 | $25,742 |
74 | Little Bison Farm LLC | Somis, CA 93066 | $23,151 |
75 | Sasaki Family Partnership | Encino, CA 91316 | $22,193 |
76 | Shane L Butler Family Growers LLC | Ventura, CA 93007 | $21,894 |
77 | Douglas Homze | Ojai, CA 93023 | $20,725 |
78 | Zuma Orchids LLC | Malibu, CA 90265 | $20,407 |
79 | Donna Johanson | Santa Rosa Valley, CA 93012 | $19,934 |
80 | Dennis Noble | Moorpark, CA 93021 | $19,801 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”