Total Commodity Programs in Ventura County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 181
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Ventura County, California totaled $8,385,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | R A Atmore & Sons Inc Dba Foothill Weed Abatement | Ventura, CA 93003 | $6,920 |
122 | Craig Held | Ventura, CA 93007 | $6,535 |
123 | David Fee | Santa Barbara, CA 93108 | $6,400 |
124 | Superior Fresh Farms Inc | Oxnard, CA 93031 | $6,341 |
125 | Robert And Patricia Morris-dba Farmor Ranch | Fillmore, CA 93015 | $5,992 |
126 | Friends Stable And Orchard Inc. | Ojai, CA 93023 | $5,946 |
127 | Roger D Clow | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $5,834 |
128 | Keith Huss | Camarillo, CA 93012 | $5,801 |
129 | Billiwhack Ranch LLC | Los Angeles, CA 90039 | $5,764 |
130 | William D Kile | Fillmore, CA 93015 | $5,385 |
131 | Maple Leaf, Inc | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $5,172 |
132 | Nomel Properties | Ventura, CA 93003 | $5,147 |
133 | Ralph Mahan Sep Property Trust | Moorpark, CA 93021 | $5,062 |
134 | Margaret Vanderfin | Camarillo, CA 93012 | $5,006 |
135 | Aubrey Sloan Jr | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $4,965 |
136 | Shepherdess Land & Livestock Co., LLC | Ojai, CA 93023 | $4,860 |
137 | Ruth Lacy Generation Skipping Trust | Santa Ana, CA 92705 | $4,696 |
138 | Julie Lovelace | Piru, CA 93040 | $4,681 |
139 | Buon Gusto LLC | Ventura, CA 93002 | $4,639 |
140 | Thomas Turner | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $4,502 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”