Farm Subsidy information
Ventura County, California
Total Subsidies in Ventura County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 204
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ventura County, California totaled $13,624,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | John R Martin | Carpinteria, CA 93014 | $8,031 |
142 | Leaf'd Garden Inc | Ventura, CA 93003 | $7,758 |
143 | Rancho Ventura | Ventura, CA 93004 | $7,610 |
144 | Donald Thompson | Carpinteria, CA 93014 | $7,450 |
145 | Clean & White Service, Inc. | Granada Hills, CA 91344 | $7,402 |
146 | Harmon Canyon Ranch Gp | Ojai, CA 93023 | $7,252 |
147 | Philip F Johnston | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $7,100 |
148 | Craig Held | Ventura, CA 93007 | $6,535 |
149 | David Fee | Santa Barbara, CA 93108 | $6,400 |
150 | Superior Fresh Farms Inc | Oxnard, CA 93031 | $6,341 |
151 | Robert And Patricia Morris-dba Farmor Ranch | Fillmore, CA 93015 | $5,992 |
152 | Friends Stable And Orchard Inc. | Ojai, CA 93023 | $5,946 |
153 | Michael Fiano | Ventura, CA 93001 | $5,822 |
154 | Keith Huss | Camarillo, CA 93012 | $5,801 |
155 | Shepherdess Land & Livestock Co., LLC | Ojai, CA 93023 | $5,784 |
156 | William D Kile | Fillmore, CA 93015 | $5,385 |
157 | W-d Investments LLC | Somis, CA 93066 | $5,317 |
158 | Maple Leaf, Inc | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $5,172 |
159 | Nomel Properties | Ventura, CA 93003 | $5,147 |
160 | Ralph Mahan Sep Property Trust | Moorpark, CA 93021 | $5,062 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”