Total Commodity Programs in Ventura County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 181
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Ventura County, California totaled $8,385,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Benchmark Partners Ag LLC | Valencia, CA 91355 | $2,078 |
162 | Rancho Codo LLC | Simi Valley, CA 93065 | $1,876 |
163 | William Hinderer | Westlake Village, CA 91361 | $1,847 |
164 | Michael Fiano | Ventura, CA 93001 | $1,607 |
165 | Jose Daniel Hernandez Vera Dba- Daniel And Sons Fl | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $1,562 |
166 | C Leon Nelson | Highland, UT 84003 | $1,440 |
167 | Valdemar Ericson | Simi Valley, CA 93094 | $1,382 |
168 | Glen & Kimberly Carmichael Jt Living Trust | Somis, CA 93066 | $1,325 |
169 | Sespe Farm Management Inc | Fillmore, CA 93061 | $1,258 |
170 | Roger Zierenberg | Moorpark, CA 93021 | $972 |
171 | Shannon Warwar | Moorpark, CA 93021 | $881 |
172 | Alexandra G Price | Santa Paula, CA 93061 | $779 |
173 | Patricia Mercer Norris | Ojai, CA 93023 | $755 |
174 | Brian Blackshear | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $515 |
175 | Margaret Patricia Couch | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $500 |
176 | Mahan Development Corporation | Moorpark, CA 93021 | $460 |
177 | Ed J Boyle | Simi Valley, CA 93063 | $415 |
178 | Sasaki Family Trust | Encino, CA 91316 | $227 |
179 | Emma Jane Gonzalez | Ventura, CA 93001 | $185 |
180 | Karen Gail Schilbrack | Ventura, CA 93003 | $159 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”