Farm Subsidy information
Ventura County, California
Total Subsidies in Ventura County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 204
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ventura County, California totaled $13,624,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Naumann Ranch | Camarillo, CA 93011 | $500,000 |
| 2 | Leavens Ranches LLC | Ventura, CA 93007 | $487,472 |
| 3 | Baron Brothers Nursery Inc | Camarillo, CA 93012 | $408,376 |
| 4 | Milligan Ranch Partnership Lp | Somis, CA 93066 | $274,363 |
| 5 | Guayabito Farms, LLC. | Oxnard, CA 93030 | $265,037 |
| 6 | Padilla Farms, Inc. | Camarillo, CA 93010 | $250,000 |
| 7 | Nova World Fresh LLC | Camarillo, CA 93012 | $250,000 |
| 8 | Reiter Brothers Inc | Oxnard, CA 93030 | $250,000 |
| 9 | Performance Nursery Inc | Somis, CA 93066 | $250,000 |
| 10 | John & Barbara Friedrich Family Ltd Partnership | Westlake Village, CA 93162 | $249,552 |
| 11 | R A Atmore & Sons Inc Dba Foothill Weed Abatement | Ventura, CA 93003 | $226,990 |
| 12 | Rancho Largo LLC | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $207,956 |
| 13 | Mvp Farms Lp | Oxnard, CA 93036 | $164,122 |
| 14 | Pandia Seeds Inc | Ventura, CA 93003 | $155,927 |
| 15 | Jubilee Honeybee Company LLC | Camarillo, CA 93010 | $149,211 |
| 16 | Bazaldua Farms LLC | Oxnard, CA 93033 | $136,392 |
| 17 | Sunnyland Nursery LLC | Camarillo, CA 93012 | $136,257 |
| 18 | Roberta Ann Bianchi- Roberta Ann Bianchi Trust | Somis, CA 93066 | $136,229 |
| 19 | Shiroya Produce Inc. | Newbury Park, CA 91320 | $133,321 |
| 20 | Zendejas Farms Inc | Oxnard, CA 93036 | $131,603 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf