Market Gains in Yolo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 185
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Yolo County, California totaled $12,165,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Brent Clark Dba Bc Farms | El Macero, CA 95618 | $173,958 |
22 | Geer Ranch | Woodland, CA 95695 | $161,205 |
23 | Farm 2 Fly | Sacramento, CA 95835 | $160,523 |
24 | Kurt Schmalenberger | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $160,113 |
25 | Diamond D Contractors | El Macero, CA 95618 | $153,500 |
26 | Dennmark Agriculture | Winters, CA 95694 | $146,845 |
27 | Joe Heidrick Enterprises Inc | Woodland, CA 95695 | $145,951 |
28 | D & G Farms | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $139,472 |
29 | John W Saunders & Sons Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $129,475 |
30 | Jon Dewitt | Orangevale, CA 95662 | $129,070 |
31 | Dario Farms Inc | Gridley, CA 95948 | $126,458 |
32 | James R Jr And Emily Jones | Davis, CA 95617 | $126,342 |
33 | Allied American Corporation | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $119,432 |
34 | Payne Brothers Ranches | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $111,932 |
35 | William A Payne/robert B Payne In | Woodland, CA 95695 | $106,932 |
36 | Kelly Farms | Williams, CA 95987 | $105,720 |
37 | Payne Farms | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $104,105 |
38 | Ashley Payne Ranch Inc | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $103,388 |
39 | Timothy A Coelho | Woodland, CA 95695 | $97,717 |
40 | Wallace Ranches | Woodland, CA 95776 | $97,234 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”