Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Yolo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 463
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Yolo County, California totaled $12,243,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Heer Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $90,751 |
42 | Clover Anne Smith | Rescue, CA 95672 | $86,813 |
43 | Ronald Smith | Rescue, CA 95672 | $86,813 |
44 | Merwin Vineyards Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $86,459 |
45 | Dennis R Murphy | Dixon, CA 95620 | $84,546 |
46 | Maren Murphy | Dixon, CA 95620 | $84,546 |
47 | John Jay Anderson | Sacramento, CA 95833 | $83,814 |
48 | Pylman Vineyards Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $80,000 |
49 | Harlan Family Ranch Inc | Woodland, CA 95695 | $80,000 |
50 | Cornwell Farming Co Inc | Woodland, CA 95776 | $80,000 |
51 | Knaggs Walnut Ranches Lp | Sacramento, CA 95825 | $80,000 |
52 | Amandeep Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $80,000 |
53 | Candice J Hatanaka | Woodland, CA 95695 | $79,177 |
54 | David Hatanaka | Esparto, CA 95627 | $79,177 |
55 | B & T Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $77,940 |
56 | Joseph R Perry | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $71,070 |
57 | Ronald R Tadlock Trust | Woodland, CA 95776 | $70,617 |
58 | Monticello Farming LLC | Winters, CA 95694 | $69,445 |
59 | T R Martin | Winters, CA 95694 | $68,274 |
60 | Taber & Son Ranch | Esparto, CA 95627 | $68,238 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”