Farm Subsidy information
Yolo County, California
Total Subsidies in Yolo County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 396
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yolo County, California totaled $20,727,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | S H Merwin And Sons Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $118,165 |
42 | Bob J Murphy | Brooks, CA 95606 | $112,890 |
43 | Amandeep Singh | Union City, CA 94587 | $112,568 |
44 | Amanjot Bains | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $107,614 |
45 | John Dewit | Davis, CA 95618 | $106,562 |
46 | E & J Farms Inc | Woodland, CA 95695 | $106,269 |
47 | Rehman Family Farms | Sacramento, CA 95834 | $105,464 |
48 | Mission Livestock Management | Dixon, CA 95620 | $99,414 |
49 | A & C Vieira Dairy | Winters, CA 95694 | $99,320 |
50 | Gregorio Pelayo | Alameda, CA 94501 | $93,807 |
51 | Gilliland Livestock Inc | Davis, CA 95618 | $90,672 |
52 | Robert A Paschoal | Winters, CA 95694 | $88,726 |
53 | Laura Paschoal | Winters, CA 95694 | $88,726 |
54 | David G Carrion | Esparto, CA 95627 | $80,491 |
55 | Raymond Yeung Dba Yeung Farms Specialty Produce | West Sacramento, CA 95691 | $72,378 |
56 | Frederick J Durst | Woodland, CA 95695 | $70,805 |
57 | Merwin Vineyards Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $69,362 |
58 | Jonnalee Dunn | Modesto, CA 95358 | $68,556 |
59 | James J Pylman Dba Jim Pylman Farms | Lodi, CA 95242 | $65,423 |
60 | Thomas Hayes Sr Bypass Trust | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $65,041 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”