Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Yolo County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 417

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Yolo County, California totaled $24,637,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
61James C BorchardWoodland, CA 95695$134,265
62Half Moon Fruit & Produce CoWoodland, CA 95695$124,896
63Michael W Slaven Dba Slaven FarmsZamora, CA 95698$120,569
64S H Merwin And Sons IncClarksburg, CA 95612$118,165
65Slater Farms IncClarksburg, CA 95612$116,615
66Madison FarmsRoseville, CA 95661$114,143
67Duane ChamberlainWoodland, CA 95695$112,168
68Amanjot BainsYuba City, CA 95991$107,614
69John DewitDavis, CA 95618$106,562
70E & J Farms IncWoodland, CA 95695$106,269
71Tr Martin & Dorothy Martin FamilyWinters, CA 95694$103,627
72Lang Orchards LLCW Sacramento, CA 95691$95,756
73Gordon Farms IncBrooks, CA 95606$93,451
74Double U Fish RanchDavis, CA 95616$91,090
75Robert A PaschoalWinters, CA 95694$88,726
76Laura PaschoalWinters, CA 95694$88,726
77Adele Abele Giovannetti Rev Lvg TYolo, CA 95697$87,545
78Ajk Farms LLCWoodbridge, CA 95258$84,527
79Lang Family No 1 Limited PartnersWest Sacramento, CA 95691$80,681
80Heer Pistachio Farms IncWest Sacramento, CA 95691$79,684

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag