Farm Subsidy information
Yolo County, California
Total Subsidies in Yolo County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 143
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yolo County, California totaled $17,946,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dutra Hay Grain And Livestock | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $5,660 |
82 | Kenneth L Wallace Living Trust | Woodland, CA 95695 | $5,611 |
83 | Schlosser And Son | Zamora, CA 95698 | $5,557 |
84 | Randy M Timothy | Woodland, CA 95695 | $5,307 |
85 | Esteban Moreno Cuevas | Winters, CA 95694 | $5,281 |
86 | Free Spirit Farm, Inc. | Winters, CA 95694 | $5,236 |
87 | Karen Stone | Woodland, CA 95695 | $4,989 |
88 | Howard L & Bonnie A Lopez Trust | Esparto, CA 95627 | $4,770 |
89 | Thomas Hayes Sr Bypass Trust | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $4,753 |
90 | Darby Point LLC | Capay, CA 95607 | $4,736 |
91 | Robert A Paschoal | Winters, CA 95694 | $4,631 |
92 | Laura Paschoal | Winters, CA 95694 | $4,631 |
93 | Gregorio Pelayo | Alameda, CA 94501 | $4,510 |
94 | Scott Stone | Woodland, CA 95695 | $4,427 |
95 | Tim Castaneda | Woodland, CA 95695 | $4,207 |
96 | Mary Castaneda | Woodland, CA 95695 | $4,207 |
97 | Garreth B And Marlene M Schaad Survivors Trust | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $4,022 |
98 | , | $3,635 | |
99 | Catherine Suematsu | Rumsey, CA 95679 | $3,564 |
100 | Joan Drake Brown | Chapel Hill, NC 27517 | $3,465 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”