Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Yolo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 463
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Yolo County, California totaled $12,243,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Noce Piantagione | Half Moon Bay, CA 94019 | $18,640 |
162 | Schlosser And Son | Zamora, CA 95698 | $18,618 |
163 | Sakai Farms Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $17,983 |
164 | Richard Higson | San Francisco, CA 94108 | $17,240 |
165 | Winston R Peterson II | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $16,691 |
166 | Kimura & Sons Inc | Woodland, CA 95776 | $16,286 |
167 | Daljit Hundal | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $16,251 |
168 | Robert L Button Testamentary Tru | Winters, CA 95694 | $15,934 |
169 | Martha W Button Griffin Limited P | Winters, CA 95694 | $15,934 |
170 | Minkler Enterprises | Orland, CA 95963 | $15,673 |
171 | Connor Family Rev Tr Dtd 3/6/98 | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $15,355 |
172 | John J Sheehan | Guinda, CA 95637 | $15,085 |
173 | Slater Farms Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $14,931 |
174 | George Oliver | Woodland, CA 95695 | $14,808 |
175 | Sam Martin | Winters, CA 95694 | $14,305 |
176 | Robert Ferrero | Woodland, CA 95695 | $14,087 |
177 | George Burger | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $13,664 |
178 | Faris Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $13,445 |
179 | Jorge Martinez | Woodland, CA 95695 | $12,773 |
180 | Xochitl Martinez | Woodland, CA 95695 | $12,773 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”