Farm Subsidy information
Yolo County, California
Total Subsidies in Yolo County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 463
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yolo County, California totaled $31,649,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dan Best Ranch Inc | Woodland, CA 95776 | $335,186 |
22 | Buckeye Creek Farms Inc | Chico, CA 95926 | $332,817 |
23 | Capay Canyon Ranch | Esparto, CA 95627 | $318,215 |
24 | Barrios Brothers Inc | Yolo, CA 95697 | $316,027 |
25 | Full Belly Farm, Inc. | Guinda, CA 95637 | $314,066 |
26 | Madison Farms | Roseville, CA 95661 | $303,437 |
27 | Circle D Farms Inc | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $279,030 |
28 | Dunnigan Hills Ranch LLC | Zamora, CA 95698 | $273,508 |
29 | Ronald R Tadlock Trust | Woodland, CA 95776 | $266,792 |
30 | Robben Cattle Co LLC | Dixon, CA 95620 | $259,924 |
31 | Donald W Beeman | Woodland, CA 95695 | $257,503 |
32 | Dixon Ridge Farms | Winters, CA 95694 | $256,854 |
33 | Raminder S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $250,000 |
34 | Clayton Kenneth Kniebel | White City, KS 66872 | $245,934 |
35 | Gordon Farms Inc | Brooks, CA 95606 | $226,941 |
36 | Hermle Farms | Zamora, CA 95698 | $208,828 |
37 | Tr Martin & Dorothy Martin Family | Winters, CA 95694 | $197,190 |
38 | Michael W Slaven Dba Slaven Farms | Zamora, CA 95698 | $188,867 |
39 | Christopher Ochoa & Mark Ochoa C & M Ochoa | Woodland, CA 95695 | $179,903 |
40 | Frederick J Durst | Woodland, CA 95695 | $172,322 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”