Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Yolo County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 45
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Yolo County, California totaled $216,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Barrios Farms Inc | Yolo, CA 95697 | $89 |
| 22 | Jack Wallace Family LLC | Woodland, CA 95776 | $88 |
| 23 | Farm Credit West ** | Rocklin, CA 95677 | $85 |
| 24 | M & F Farms | Woodland, CA 95695 | $71 |
| 25 | Billie B Martin Dba Martin Family Farms | Davis, CA 95618 | $66 |
| 26 | Dan Best Ranch Inc | Woodland, CA 95776 | $60 |
| 27 | Four D Farms LLC | Woodland, CA 95695 | $52 |
| 28 | W Kent Ramos | West Sacramento, CA 95691 | $51 |
| 29 | Bob Dettling Farms A General Partnership | El Macero, CA 95618 | $47 |
| 30 | Baird 1995 Trust | Woodland, CA 95776 | $33 |
| 31 | Barbara Frey - Separate Property Trust | Thousand Oaks, CA 91362 | $19 |
| 32 | Isabel Story - Isabel Story Revocable Trust | Sacramento, CA 95821 | $17 |
| 33 | Goodnow Ranch | Esparto, CA 95627 | $12 |
| 34 | Henry E Rodegerdts | Zamora, CA 95698 | $11 |
| 35 | Cen-cal Farms | Davis, CA 95616 | $11 |
| 36 | Janet - 2006 Stanley W Levers And | Woodland, CA 95695 | $11 |
| 37 | Sucha Singh | Olivehurst, CA 95961 | $10 |
| 38 | Richard A Riolo | Roseville, CA 95747 | $7 |
| 39 | Louise Pryor Charles | Woodland, CA 95695 | $5 |
| 40 | Mollie Pryor | Woodland, CA 95695 | $5 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf