Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Yolo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 317
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Yolo County, California totaled $5,344,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hunn & Merwin & Merwin Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $39,086 |
42 | Mark Ochoa | Woodland, CA 95695 | $38,801 |
43 | Bernell Harlan Jr | Woodland, CA 95695 | $38,643 |
44 | Stan L Barth | Esparto, CA 95627 | $38,043 |
45 | Laura Paschoal | Winters, CA 95694 | $37,218 |
46 | Borchard Brothers | Woodland, CA 95695 | $36,271 |
47 | Samara Ranches LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $35,916 |
48 | Rominger Brothers Farms Inc | Winters, CA 95694 | $35,881 |
49 | D. Campos Ag And Orchards, LLC | Woodland, CA 95776 | $31,390 |
50 | Capay Valley Ranches Inc | Woodland, CA 95695 | $31,282 |
51 | Bains Farms LLC | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $28,940 |
52 | Lang Orchards LLC | W Sacramento, CA 95691 | $28,490 |
53 | Ronald Smith | Rescue, CA 95672 | $27,883 |
54 | Iqbal S Sra | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $26,497 |
55 | Rominger Rice | Winters, CA 95694 | $26,334 |
56 | Geer Ranch A Partnership | Woodland, CA 95695 | $26,177 |
57 | Columbia Farms LLC | Colusa, CA 95932 | $25,875 |
58 | Thomas Hayes Sr Bypass Trust | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $25,477 |
59 | Joseph R Perry | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $25,361 |
60 | Amanjot Bains | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $25,014 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”