Total Conservation Programs in Yolo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 315
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Yolo County, California totaled $14,607,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kay Family Trust | Davis, CA 95616 | $92,738 |
42 | Thomas E Hayes Sr | Woodland, CA 95695 | $91,788 |
43 | Skyraker Duck Club Inc C/o Ray Th | Davis, CA 95618 | $88,060 |
44 | Oscar Durst Jr | Capay, CA 95607 | $86,532 |
45 | Dunnigan Hills Farming Co | Alamo, CA 94507 | $86,529 |
46 | Edwin F Virgin Jr | Sacramento, CA 95834 | $84,897 |
47 | Nicholas H Hrdy | Winters, CA 95694 | $82,629 |
48 | Clare E Rominger Survivors Tr | Winters, CA 95694 | $76,785 |
49 | Shirley Gooch Revocable Trust | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $76,382 |
50 | Simon Espitallier | Woodland, CA 95695 | $75,990 |
51 | Joseph G Tomlinson | Woodland, CA 95695 | $74,760 |
52 | Lillard Family Limited Partnershi | Woodland, CA 95695 | $74,085 |
53 | Rancho Los Cerritos | Winters, CA 95694 | $71,312 |
54 | Button & Turkovich, LLC | Winters, CA 95694 | $70,461 |
55 | George Durst Ranch | Capay, CA 95607 | $69,802 |
56 | The Schlosser Family Trust, Dated | Zamora, CA 95698 | $69,730 |
57 | Conaway Conservancy Group | Woodland, CA 95776 | $67,230 |
58 | Pfc Inc | Rescue, CA 95672 | $64,179 |
59 | Estate Of Browning Allen Jr | La Verne, CA 91750 | $60,874 |
60 | Myrtis Weidemier | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $60,693 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”