Total Commodity Programs in Yuba County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 156
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $2,144,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Alfaro Farms | San Francisco, CA 94122 | $17,381 |
22 | Devalentine Family Partnership | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $16,991 |
23 | Rick Sohrakoff | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $16,563 |
24 | Smith Ranches B G M | Marysville, CA 95901 | $15,706 |
25 | Horton Rosser | Marysville, CA 95901 | $15,522 |
26 | B & R Rice Farms LLC | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $15,243 |
27 | Vineyard Brothers | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $15,035 |
28 | Ramsaran S Dhanota | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $14,085 |
29 | David A Gibb | Olivehurst, CA 95961 | $13,960 |
30 | Eager Christiansen & Rue | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $13,888 |
31 | Khan Ahmed Khan | Marysville, CA 95901 | $13,757 |
32 | Prairie Creek Ranch 1 LLC | Berkeley, CA 94710 | $13,614 |
33 | Rue Ranch Partnership LLC | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $12,597 |
34 | Arrozal LLC | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $11,725 |
35 | Biju George | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $11,619 |
36 | Norene Ranches Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $10,798 |
37 | A & R Bertolini Farms Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $10,224 |
38 | Dianna Taylor | Browns Valley, CA 95918 | $9,979 |
39 | Rena Scheiber | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $9,929 |
40 | K-four Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $9,906 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”