Total Disaster Programs in Yuba County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 605
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $29,939,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Amarjit K Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $124,094 |
62 | Sewa S Heir | Marysville, CA 95901 | $122,846 |
63 | H B Orchard Co Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $122,763 |
64 | Mohan & Bhajan Aujla | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $121,993 |
65 | Pearson Family Living Trust 7-25-96 | Arboga, CA 95901 | $120,692 |
66 | Allen Brothers Land Company LLC | Chico, CA 95927 | $117,875 |
67 | Khan Ahmed Khan | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $117,054 |
68 | Gregory L Foster | Winnemucca, NV 89446 | $114,989 |
69 | Thiara Agribusiness | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $110,160 |
70 | Alfaro Farms | San Francisco, CA 94122 | $108,232 |
71 | Ajit S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $105,411 |
72 | Black Diamond Farming | Del Mar, CA 92014 | $105,130 |
73 | Surinder Bains | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $103,763 |
74 | Inderbitzen Bros | Marysville, CA 95901 | $103,612 |
75 | William A Baggett Farming | Marysville, CA 95901 | $101,968 |
76 | Satinder Davit | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $101,351 |
77 | Douglas T Holzum | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $101,044 |
78 | Roldolphe A Mirassou | Marysville, CA 95901 | $94,809 |
79 | Algodon Inc. | Marysville, CA 95901 | $94,802 |
80 | Sohal Brothers | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $94,044 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”