Total Commodity Programs in Yuba County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 156
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $2,144,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Stake Iron Ranch | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $4,806 |
82 | John Morello | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $4,586 |
83 | Linda Morello | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $4,586 |
84 | Jim C Gleason | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $4,586 |
85 | Casey Vogt Separate Property Farming Trust | Davis, CA 95616 | $4,547 |
86 | Dos Pescadores Farms Partnership | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $4,342 |
87 | Melrina A Houser | El Macero, CA 95618 | $4,311 |
88 | Five B Farming | Rocklin, CA 95765 | $4,302 |
89 | George Doersch | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $4,132 |
90 | Mohammad Firouzabadi | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $4,036 |
91 | Sarbdeep Atwal | Olivehurst, CA 95961 | $3,810 |
92 | Kathleen S Farster | Marysville, CA 95901 | $3,672 |
93 | Dennis Farster | Marysville, CA 95901 | $3,672 |
94 | O I I Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $3,588 |
95 | Stephen Waltz | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $3,526 |
96 | Janet Waltz | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $3,526 |
97 | Jim And Jeri Walsh Trust 1 | Marysville, CA 95901 | $3,444 |
98 | San Felipe Properties Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $3,161 |
99 | Carol Edwards | Marysville, CA 95901 | $3,089 |
100 | Michael Gregory Mathews | Marysville, CA 95901 | $3,003 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”