Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Yuba County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 125
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $3,846,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Steven Filter | Gridley, CA 95948 | $3,170 |
102 | Wayne Sohrakoff | Eureka, CA 95503 | $2,921 |
103 | Tammie Hudson | Marysville, CA 95901 | $2,848 |
104 | Joseph Waltz | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $2,706 |
105 | Sandra Barton | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $2,407 |
106 | Boom Sycamore Farms LLC | Lexington, KY 40502 | $2,298 |
107 | Ashley Enterprises LLC | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $2,179 |
108 | De Palma Orchards Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $2,117 |
109 | William Lowe | Marysville, CA 95901 | $2,083 |
110 | Sidney - Muck Family Trust Muck | West Sacramento, CA 95691 | $2,075 |
111 | North Bear River Walnut Ranch LLC | San Francisco, CA 94111 | $2,066 |
112 | Matt Kalcic | Marysville, CA 95901 | $2,020 |
113 | Sandra Parker | Marysville, CA 95901 | $1,824 |
114 | Joseph Wurm | Marysville, CA 95901 | $1,696 |
115 | Greg Sanchez | Marysville, CA 95901 | $1,679 |
116 | Sukhvir Sohal | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $1,658 |
117 | John Lewin | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $1,384 |
118 | Jeanette M Holland | Marysville, CA 95901 | $1,071 |
119 | James H Marler | Meridian, CA 95957 | $939 |
120 | Sam Wurm | Durham, CA 95938 | $869 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”