Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Yuba County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 191
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $2,200,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Lillian Sargent-smith | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $6,129 |
102 | Dalvir Gill | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $5,850 |
103 | Rue & Forsman Ranch Cotenancy | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $5,798 |
104 | Roger Abe | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $5,760 |
105 | Mark Chandless | Marysville, CA 95901 | $5,598 |
106 | Albert Lassaga | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $5,427 |
107 | Leslie Stineman | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $4,949 |
108 | Clinton D Waltz | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $4,935 |
109 | Gardella Ranch LLC | Boise, ID 83702 | $4,906 |
110 | Ramnik S Clair | Stockton, CA 95212 | $4,891 |
111 | Kulwant S Johl | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $4,836 |
112 | Thomas Belza | Marysville, CA 95901 | $4,818 |
113 | Pamela L Belza | Marysville, CA 95901 | $4,818 |
114 | Gurdawar Bains | Plumas Lake, CA 95961 | $4,570 |
115 | Bnb Investments | Oroville, CA 95966 | $4,479 |
116 | M A Khan & Sons Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $4,380 |
117 | David Zaboski | Marysville, CA 95901 | $4,322 |
118 | Chuck Pappageorge And Darlene Pap | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $4,258 |
119 | Tammie Hudson | Marysville, CA 95901 | $3,957 |
120 | John & Virginia Sohrakoff Family | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $3,773 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”