Counter Cyclical Program in Yuba County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 273
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $7,128,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Rancho El Palomar | Orinda, CA 94563 | $22,164 |
122 | D H Randall | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $22,075 |
123 | Jeanette Perkins | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $21,336 |
124 | Donald Perkins | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $21,333 |
125 | Charles And Sheila Mathews | Marysville, CA 95901 | $20,408 |
126 | Lee Miller | Marysville, CA 95901 | $20,253 |
127 | Larry Roady | Colusa, CA 95932 | $19,956 |
128 | Ginochio Properties | Concord, CA 94519 | $19,665 |
129 | Manuhui Partnership | Sacramento, CA 95824 | $19,580 |
130 | Bradley Hauck & Petzinger Ranch | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $19,289 |
131 | Quad M Family Farms | Marysville, CA 95901 | $19,278 |
132 | Jill Cenedella | Marysville, CA 95901 | $18,519 |
133 | Pamela K Griffith | Colusa, CA 95932 | $18,342 |
134 | Michael W Griffith | Colusa, CA 95932 | $18,342 |
135 | Sara Baggett | Marysville, CA 95901 | $18,325 |
136 | Alfaro Farms | San Francisco, CA 94122 | $18,272 |
137 | Albert Kibbe | Marysville, CA 95901 | $18,265 |
138 | Morry Smith | Marysville, CA 95901 | $17,313 |
139 | Dondi Mathews | Marysville, CA 95901 | $17,211 |
140 | Kristen Mathews | Marysville, CA 95901 | $17,210 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”