Market Gains in Yuba County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 180
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $9,101,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | San Rafael Farms | Montecito, CA 93108 | $5,252 |
122 | Lorraine Messick | Flintridge, CA 91011 | $5,052 |
123 | Robert Messick | San Francisco, CA 94109 | $5,052 |
124 | Joyce Magenheimer | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $4,895 |
125 | Neal Jeff Tom Siller | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $4,529 |
126 | Patricia Hess | Camarillo, CA 93010 | $4,504 |
127 | Larry Roady | Colusa, CA 95932 | $4,342 |
128 | Sam Mathews | Marysville, CA 95901 | $3,624 |
129 | Gerald C Harter | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $3,354 |
130 | Millicent Magee | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $3,324 |
131 | William & Millicent Magee Fam Liv | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $3,324 |
132 | Joseph A Duffel | Concord, CA 94520 | $3,199 |
133 | Lora Duffel | Concord, CA 94520 | $3,199 |
134 | Patricia Rue | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $3,053 |
135 | Kenny Living Trust | Saratoga, CA 95070 | $3,053 |
136 | F R Burke III | Grass Valley, CA 95945 | $3,030 |
137 | Michael Gregory Mathews | Marysville, CA 95901 | $2,998 |
138 | X2 Farms | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $2,873 |
139 | Walter E And Eileen J Bird Rev Trust | Chico, CA 95973 | $2,825 |
140 | Daniel & Dianne Higgins Rev Trust | Marysville, CA 95901 | $2,825 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”