Farm Subsidy information
Yuba County, California
Total Subsidies in Yuba County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 265
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $14,289,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Golden Valley Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $54,346 |
42 | David A Gibb | Olivehurst, CA 95961 | $53,779 |
43 | Devalentine Family Partnership | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $53,051 |
44 | Frank Webb | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $51,568 |
45 | Williams Group | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $50,536 |
46 | Avoca Wheatland, Lp | San Francisco, CA 94108 | $50,143 |
47 | Scott Staas | Marysville, CA 95901 | $50,014 |
48 | Pearson Family Living Trust 7-25-96 | Arboga, CA 95901 | $49,456 |
49 | Jasbir Bains | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $49,453 |
50 | Joe And Josina Conant Inc | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $46,383 |
51 | Surinder Bains | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $44,573 |
52 | Ramsaran S Dhanota | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $44,062 |
53 | Rancho Cenedella Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $39,945 |
54 | James Paul Perry | Marysville, CA 95901 | $39,852 |
55 | Carol L Butler | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $39,540 |
56 | Vineyard Brothers | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $38,701 |
57 | Krishan S Dhanota | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $38,531 |
58 | Rawhide Holdings LLC | Marysville, CA 95901 | $38,181 |
59 | Khan Ahmed Khan | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $37,236 |
60 | Black Diamond Farming | Del Mar, CA 92014 | $36,145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”