Total Disaster Programs in Yuba County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 105
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $5,172,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Richard Wilbur Ranch | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $457,796 |
2 | K-four Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $257,891 |
3 | Auburn Ravine Ranch Inc | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $214,959 |
4 | Heer Atwal Orchards | Olivehurst, CA 95961 | $205,847 |
5 | Albert Lassaga | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $203,948 |
6 | Jasmin K Thiara | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $186,781 |
7 | Laura Holmes Peters | Oakville, CA 94562 | $172,913 |
8 | Johl Orchards | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $160,526 |
9 | Dalvir Gill | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $150,365 |
10 | De Palma Orchards Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $142,057 |
11 | Riverside Ranches LLC | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $141,758 |
12 | Smith Ranches B G M | Marysville, CA 95901 | $141,564 |
13 | Rancho Cenedella Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $125,000 |
14 | Sarbdeep Atwal | Olivehurst, CA 95961 | $125,000 |
15 | Pearson Family Living Trust 7-25-96 | Arboga, CA 95901 | $120,692 |
16 | Allen Brothers Land Company LLC | Chico, CA 95927 | $117,875 |
17 | Ranvir Singh | Plumas Lake, CA 95961 | $114,104 |
18 | Charles Deforest | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $103,755 |
19 | Ramsaran S Dhanota | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $103,069 |
20 | Gill Brothers Farming | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $93,791 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>